Uvalde Families Who Says Instagram Helped Create a Monster
- Aug 21, 2025
- 2 min read
Updated: Aug 24, 2025
Social media vs grieving families courtroom drama
This Article Is Available In
Picture this: a tech giant worth hundreds of billions facing off against heartbroken parents who lost their babies in one of America's most horrific school shootings. Meta's lawyers strutted into a Los Angeles courtroom this week with one simple message - we didn't do it and you can't prove we did.
The battle centers on whether Instagram became a digital recruitment center for violence. Uvalde families claim the platform let gun manufacturer Daniel Defense parade assault rifles to kids like candy at Halloween. They pointed to posts showing Santa Claus clutching military weapons and rifles casually leaning against kitchen appliances with captions asking "what Daniels do you use to protect your home". The shooter created his Daniel Defense account before turning 18 and obsessively checked Instagram over 100 times daily.
But Meta's attorney Kristin Linsley fired back with surgical precision. No evidence exists that the Uvalde gunman ever saw those specific posts she argued. The company followed its own rules by restricting firearm content visibility to minors from late 2021 through October 2022. These weren't direct advertisements and contained no purchase links making them perfectly legal under current policies. What happens next could reshape how social media handles dangerous content...
